Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-13487

Permission property accepts String array(instead of integer) when Updating an authorization by id

      What is the desired functionality that you are missing?
      The document describes permissions property as Integer while it should be an array of String. Additionally, the example request body also has the same problem.

      Which problem are you going to solve with this functionality?
      The documentation can be updated by correcting the value accepted by permissions property.

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

            [CAM-13487] Permission property accepts String array(instead of integer) when Updating an authorization by id

            Anumeha created issue -
            Anumeha made changes -
            Assignee Original: Michal Dytko [ michal.dytko ] New: Anumeha [ anumeha.prakash ]
            Anumeha made changes -
            Link New: This issue depends on SUPPORT-10703 [ SUPPORT-10703 ]
            Anumeha made changes -
            Description Original: What is the desired functionality that you are missing?
            The [link|https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/rest/authorization/put-update/] wrongly describes the values accepted by permission property. It describes the sample request body where permission value is taken as "integer" which is wrong as it accepts String arrays.

            Which problem are you going to solve with this functionality?
            The documentation can be corrected accordingly.
            New: What is the desired functionality that you are missing?
            The [document|https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/rest/authorization/put-update/#request-body] describes *permissions* property as Integer while it should be an array of String. Additionally, the example request body also has the same problem.

            Which problem are you going to solve with this functionality?
            The documentation can be corrected by correcting the value accepted by *permissions* property.
            Anumeha made changes -
            Mentioned Roles
            Anumeha made changes -
            Mentioned Groups
            Anumeha made changes -
            Description Original: What is the desired functionality that you are missing?
            The [document|https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/rest/authorization/put-update/#request-body] describes *permissions* property as Integer while it should be an array of String. Additionally, the example request body also has the same problem.

            Which problem are you going to solve with this functionality?
            The documentation can be corrected by correcting the value accepted by *permissions* property.
            New: What is the desired functionality that you are missing?
             The [document|https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/rest/authorization/put-update/#request-body] describes *permissions* property as Integer while it should be an array of String. Additionally, the example request body also has the same problem.

            Which problem are you going to solve with this functionality?
             The documentation can be updated by correcting the value accepted by *permissions* property.
            Anumeha made changes -
            Mentioned Roles
            Anumeha made changes -
            Mentioned Groups
            Anumeha made changes -
            Component/s New: documentation [ 11657 ]
            Component/s Original: documentation [ 12053 ]
            Environment Original: Camunda Platform version 7.16
            Issue Type Original: Bug Report [ 1 ] New: Task [ 3 ]
            Key Original: SUPPORT-10723 New: CAM-13487
            Project Original: Support [ 10111 ] New: camunda BPM [ 10230 ]
            Security Original: Private Support Case [ 10110 ]
            Workflow Original: Support-New [ 93305 ] New: Backup_camunda BPM [ 93309 ]
            Miklas Boskamp made changes -
            Assignee Original: Anumeha [ anumeha.prakash ] New: Miklas Boskamp [ miklas.boskamp ]

              anumeha.prakash Anumeha
              anumeha.prakash Anumeha
              Anumeha Anumeha
              Miklas Boskamp Miklas Boskamp
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: