Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-12135

Add configuration Option to reinitialize Tasks after migration

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: L3 - Default L3 - Default
    • None
    • None
    • tasklist
    • None
    • Wildfly
      Chrome
      H2
      java version "14.0.1"

      Given
      One running instance of process_version1 waiting at User Task 2

      Steps to reproduce
      1. Deploy process_version2
      2. Start the version migration and change the mapping from User Task 2 to User Task 1
      3. Perform the migration.
      4. Goto tasklist and select User Task 1.

      Actual outcome
      Tasklist shows User Task 2 instead of User Task 1

      Expected outcome
      Tasklist should display User Task 1 because we changed the mapping in the migration

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

            [CAM-12135] Add configuration Option to reinitialize Tasks after migration

            Martin Stamm added a comment - - edited

            Hi hariharan.parasuraman,

             

            This is actually expected behavior so that Taskworkers are not interrupted on an active task during migration. It is documented here: https://docs.camunda.org/manual/7.13/user-guide/process-engine/process-instance-migration/#user-task

             

            We can convert this ticket into a Feature Request to make it configurable, because this behavior is unexpected at first glance

            Martin Stamm added a comment - - edited Hi hariharan.parasuraman ,   This is actually expected behavior so that Taskworkers are not interrupted on an active task during migration. It is documented here:  https://docs.camunda.org/manual/7.13/user-guide/process-engine/process-instance-migration/#user-task   We can convert this ticket into a Feature Request to make it configurable, because this behavior is unexpected at first glance

            Hi martin.stamm

            Thanks for the update and letting me know the reason for this behaviour. 

            What is the next step in the process regarding changing it to a feature request? Can this be performed by either one of us or does Andre need to do this? Please advise. Thanks!

            Hariharan Parasuraman added a comment - Hi martin.stamm ,  Thanks for the update and letting me know the reason for this behaviour.  What is the next step in the process regarding changing it to a feature request? Can this be performed by either one of us or does Andre need to do this? Please advise. Thanks!

            Martin Stamm added a comment -

            I just changed it 

            Martin Stamm added a comment - I just changed it 

            Great. Thank you!

            Hariharan Parasuraman added a comment - Great. Thank you!

              Unassigned Unassigned
              hariharan.parasuraman Hariharan Parasuraman
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: