Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-1654

As DEV, I can define a follow up date for tasks

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: L3 - Default L3 - Default
    • 7.1.0, 7.1.0-alpha2
    • None
    • engine
    • None

      AT:

      • follow up date for tasks is available for all APIs
      • Docs are updated
      • History is updated
      • Upgrade Scripts are updated

      Motivation:

      Typically for Tasks there are two dates which almost task management tools know, I added a screenshot of Outlook to show them there (in German):

      • Beginnt am (starts at)
      • Fällig am (due at)

      With dueDate and followUpDate we are perfectly capable of handling this in the Task Management - even in situations where we do not hace processes (like in case management for example). This is why I like this feature so much.

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

          1. taskOutlook.png
            taskOutlook.png
            22 kB

            [CAM-1654] As DEV, I can define a follow up date for tasks

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment -

            I start working on a Pull request for this.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - I start working on a Pull request for this.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited

            Changed database, added two columns

            ACT_RU_TASK: FOLLOW_UP_DATE_ timestamp
            ACT_HI_TASKINST: FOLLOW_UP_DATE_ timestamp

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited Changed database, added two columns ACT_RU_TASK : FOLLOW_UP_DATE_ timestamp ACT_HI_TASKINST : FOLLOW_UP_DATE_ timestamp

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited

            I send a pull request in a minute containint:

            • TaskEntity
            • HistoricTaskInstanceEntity
            • both Queries (including sorting)
            • database create and update scripts (7.0 -> 7.1)

            I actually could not test all update scripts / databases, but had a really close eye on it so Jenkins should be happy with it.

            For REST docs I will commit the docs after the pull request is accepted - as I do not have a fork of the docs ready. Hopefully OK? Or do you want me to do a pull request there as well?

            For the docs the problem is that we lack any concept "Task" in the docs at the moment - so there is no hook to add it. So either we move that to an own issue (which I would vote for) - or I write a Task concept part for the docs.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited I send a pull request in a minute containint: TaskEntity HistoricTaskInstanceEntity both Queries (including sorting) database create and update scripts (7.0 -> 7.1) I actually could not test all update scripts / databases, but had a really close eye on it so Jenkins should be happy with it. For REST docs I will commit the docs after the pull request is accepted - as I do not have a fork of the docs ready. Hopefully OK? Or do you want me to do a pull request there as well? For the docs the problem is that we lack any concept "Task" in the docs at the moment - so there is no hook to add it. So either we move that to an own issue (which I would vote for) - or I write a Task concept part for the docs.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited

            Here is the Pull Request for the feature: https://github.com/camunda/camunda-bpm-platform/pull/57

            REST docs will be added as soon it is accepted.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - - edited Here is the Pull Request for the feature: https://github.com/camunda/camunda-bpm-platform/pull/57 REST docs will be added as soon it is accepted.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment -

            Pull request for REST docs: https://github.com/camunda/docs.camunda.org/pull/20

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - Pull request for REST docs: https://github.com/camunda/docs.camunda.org/pull/20

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment -

            What I did not add was the Property on the Modeler Panel. Actually it would be pretty hard for me to create a pull request for this - but maybe a good exercise Let me know if you would like to have it as well.

            Bernd Ruecker added a comment - What I did not add was the Property on the Modeler Panel. Actually it would be pretty hard for me to create a pull request for this - but maybe a good exercise Let me know if you would like to have it as well.

            Robert Gimbel added a comment -

            no nee to change the modeler, we can provide that with the next modeler release

            Robert Gimbel added a comment - no nee to change the modeler, we can provide that with the next modeler release

              sebastian.menski Sebastian Menski
              gimbel Robert Gimbel
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: