Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-3826

Write migration tests for job definitions/job execution for async MI tasks

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: L3 - Default L3 - Default
    • 7.3.0, 7.3.0-alpha4
    • None
    • engine
    • None

      Issue 1: Process instances containing asynchronous continuations before or after tasks with mi-loop characteristics:
      the achtityId property in the job definition used to reference the inner activity. Starting from 7.3 it should reference the Mi-Body.

      We need to write testcases in which we deploy such a process with 7.2 and assert the expected behavior after parsing.

      Expected behavior:

      • the job definitions are "migrated" meaning that the activityId in the job definition is adjusted to the activity id of the mi-body

      ===

      Issue 2: async jobs before multi instance tasks created in 7.2 reference the inner activity; when executing these jobs with 7.3, they won't execute the multi-instance body, thus simply executing the inner activity once. Reason: the execution entity referenced by the job points at the inner activity.

      Expected behavior:

      • when such a job is executed, the execution is set to the multi-instance body first

      ===

      Note: asyncAfter on multi-instance activities is seriously broken in 7.2.0, so I won't create a migration test.

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

              sebastian.menski Sebastian Menski
              meyer Daniel Meyer
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: