Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-3826

Write migration tests for job definitions/job execution for async MI tasks

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Task
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • L3 - Default
    • 7.3.0, 7.3.0-alpha4
    • None
    • engine
    • None

    Description

      Issue 1: Process instances containing asynchronous continuations before or after tasks with mi-loop characteristics:
      the achtityId property in the job definition used to reference the inner activity. Starting from 7.3 it should reference the Mi-Body.

      We need to write testcases in which we deploy such a process with 7.2 and assert the expected behavior after parsing.

      Expected behavior:

      • the job definitions are "migrated" meaning that the activityId in the job definition is adjusted to the activity id of the mi-body

      ===

      Issue 2: async jobs before multi instance tasks created in 7.2 reference the inner activity; when executing these jobs with 7.3, they won't execute the multi-instance body, thus simply executing the inner activity once. Reason: the execution entity referenced by the job points at the inner activity.

      Expected behavior:

      • when such a job is executed, the execution is set to the multi-instance body first

      ===

      Note: asyncAfter on multi-instance activities is seriously broken in 7.2.0, so I won't create a migration test.

      mgm-controller-panel

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

                sebastian.menski Sebastian Menski
                meyer Daniel Meyer
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Salesforce