Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-7610

Variable is not implicitly updated if scope is destroyed in same transaction

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Icon: L3 - Default L3 - Default
    • 7.8.0, 7.8.0-alpha2
    • None
    • engine
    • None

      Scenario:

      • process instance with a variable of type object
      • update that object value implicity (i.e. without calling DelegateExecution#setVariable or similar)
      • process instance ends in same transaction

      Result:

      • variable update is not reflected in history

      Expected behavior:

      • it should be visible in history

      Variants:

      • this is not only the case for the process scope, but basically for any scope (i.e. updates local variables of subprocesses are not reflected in history if the subprocess ends in same transaction)

      Root cause:

      • destroying a scope clears all the variables
      • clearing variables drops the cached value
      • check for implicit value updates happens only after that and is based on the cached value

      Forum post:

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

              thorben.lindhauer Thorben Lindhauer
              thorben.lindhauer Thorben Lindhauer
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: