Uploaded image for project: 'camunda BPM'
  1. camunda BPM
  2. CAM-8599

I can skip all (e.g. io mappings) when deleting process instances in batch

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: L3 - Default L3 - Default
    • None
    • None
    • engine

      User Story (Required on creation):
      There are cases where process instances failed because of development errors (variable mapping or whatever). These instances are still in the "running" state. As a operator i want to be able to delete these instances via batch mode.

      In our case, for example, we face such problem and, although we need to delete these instances, it is not possible to do so using the Batch mode (it does not work and we received no clear error message why). It is also common in similar circumstances to have an high number of these instances (100's, 1000's), so deletion one by one is not an option.

      Functional Requirements (Required before implementation):
      Batch mode to allow the deletion of *any *process instances, whatever the problems they have encountered and whatever the state they are. It could be a special checkbox we have to click for exemple (e.g. "total delete" or something more meaningful maybe)

      Involved classes may not be available (e.g. PA is not deployed).

      Technical Requirements (Required before implementation):

      Limitations of Scope (Optional):

      Hints (Optional):

        This is the controller panel for Smart Panels app

            [CAM-8599] I can skip all (e.g. io mappings) when deleting process instances in batch

            Yordan Vachkov added a comment - - edited

            Hi Thorben Lindhauer,

            May I ask what is the state of this issue? Do you plan working on it? Would you like any kind of assistance on it - contributing, etc.? This is something that my team and I come across recently and think it will be nice to have as a feature.

            Yordan Vachkov added a comment - - edited Hi Thorben Lindhauer, May I ask what is the state of this issue? Do you plan working on it? Would you like any kind of assistance on it - contributing, etc.? This is something that my team and I come across recently and think it will be nice to have as a feature.

            Hi Yordan,

            We have currently no plans to implement this but certainly welcome a contribution. Please let me know if we can help with that.

            Cheers,
            Thorben

            Thorben Lindhauer added a comment - Hi Yordan, We have currently no plans to implement this but certainly welcome a contribution. Please let me know if we can help with that. Cheers, Thorben

            Hi Torben,

            Great to hear that you are open for a contribution. I will open a PR in the following days. Whom do I have to tag here/on the PR, once I get to some 'ready-like' stage?
            And if there is anything I think you can help me, I will let you know.

            Cheers,
            Yordan

            Yordan Vachkov added a comment - Hi Torben, Great to hear that you are open for a contribution. I will open a PR in the following days. Whom do I have to tag here/on the PR, once I get to some 'ready-like' stage? And if there is anything I think you can help me, I will let you know. Cheers, Yordan

            Hi Yordan,

            It's great that you want to build this. Just raise a PR in the repository, we check our PRs at least once per week and then assign them to a reviewer. If it's still work in progress and you would like to make some steps on your own first, please add a comment so that we know. If you do not get a response for a longer time, feel free to mention me via @ThorbenLindhauer.

            Cheers,
            Thorben

            Thorben Lindhauer added a comment - Hi Yordan, It's great that you want to build this. Just raise a PR in the repository, we check our PRs at least once per week and then assign them to a reviewer. If it's still work in progress and you would like to make some steps on your own first, please add a comment so that we know. If you do not get a response for a longer time, feel free to mention me via @ThorbenLindhauer . Cheers, Thorben

            This ticket was migrated to github: https://github.com/camunda/camunda-bpm-platform/issues/2176. Please use this link for any future references and continue any discussion there.

            Thorben Lindhauer added a comment - This ticket was migrated to github: https://github.com/camunda/camunda-bpm-platform/issues/2176 . Please use this link for any future references and continue any discussion there.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              thorben.lindhauer Thorben Lindhauer
              Votes:
              2 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: